Tuesday, 30 April 2013

Pi's Life Questions

Who knew that being stranded in a boat with a tiger in the middle of the ocean could have such a huge philosophical impact on someone? Well actually, now that I think about it, it TOTALLY makes sense.

For me at least, and not to get too preachy, I find that experiences which could technically make you doubt there is a God (huge tragedies, obstacles in life) actually do the opposite and make you closer to Him (or closer to a cosmic force, whatever you want to call it).

Living in a world where there are so many different types of beliefs and cultures, so many differing points of view and religions (which is great! It's awesome that we live in a society where people feel safe enough to express their own beliefs) it might take some people a bit of time to figure out what they personally believe in.

Obviously, we're all entitled to go through phases of doubt - doubt of a God, doubt of chance, doubt of oneself. Just like Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane, when he asks God to "take this cup" from him, talking about the burden of his impending crucifixion and when he calls out "God, why have you forsaken me?" while on the cross, we see that even the Son of God doubted his own Father's existence. (YES! All my Sunday School days have FINALLY paid off!)

And just like Yann Martel said, we must all go through our own Garden of Gethsemane, our own night of anguish and sorrow, of dread and burden. But we can't give up there, because once you get through the worst of that, you will resurrect, be born again. Maybe not in the literal way (I mean of course unless you happen to be God's son, that's cool then) but at least in an emotional way. You get a brand new perspective and a new lease on life. You become a stronger person, knowing that you made it through so much and came out okay.

Just to have faith in something is by itself, an incredible thing. To have blind faith in something you can't prove no matter how hard you try (even for atheists, you can't prove everything in science) says a lot. Which is why I don't necessarily agree with what Pi says about agnostics. Though they don't believe in anything and simply doubt everything, that's an incredibly personal choice and what one believes should be respected even if you yourself don't agree.

But his words seem to be a base of what the rest of the book is about - doubt and then rebirth. When you're almost at the point of giving up, and then being saved. Of having to faith to believing there must have been something to help you stay alive. If you're on a boat, you have no choice BUT to believe in something because if you don't believe in anything, you will die. At least if you have faith in something, you have hope that you will live which could actually be the one thing that lets you survive. Hope and faith are very powerful things.

"For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible."
- Stuart Chase

Sunday, 21 April 2013

What? I Have to Grow Up One Day?

Sometimes, it feels like life slows down. Sometimes it feels like life is passing by just way too fast. And sometimes, it just smacks you square in the face.



In my vast 16 years of life I like to think that I've become an adult, but in all honesty, in 10 years I'll probably laugh at myself because I thought I was so grown up getting my G1 (yes, yes I did get my G1 this Friday!) and being able to go out with my friends whenever I wanted. But until then, I will bask in the beautiful naivete of thinking I'm more grown up then I really am.

Now, much like the narrator in the short story "To Everything There is a Season" by Alistair MacLeod, I have gone through an experience when real life crashes in and spirits you away from the safe, sheltered world of imaginary play and Santa Claus. Just to make this clear, I have had an extremely blessed life and I thank God every singly day (really, I do) for everything. I have absolutely nothing to complain about and I have been so lucky. With respect to all my friends who have gone through a lot in their lives, here is my humble story of my smack in the face from reality.

I have realized that what I really want to do in life is humanitarian work and to become a human rights lawyer. So I felt that going on a volunteer trip to Ecuador would be the perfect first step. But boy, I did NOT realize how much work it would be.

The big thing was that I had to pay for the entire trip myself. Sure, $4000 might not be a lot for a working adult or incredibly well off people but for me, that's like climbing Mount Everest with no oxygen, that's like swimming across the Atlantic Ocean with no training, that's like trying to pass a Lemieux test without studying!!!! (Okay, maybe I'm exaggerating a tiny bit. Earning $4000 is easier then studying for a Mme. Lemieux history test.) But I didn't have a job and I don't think my monthly allowance would cover the whole trip unless I saved for 6 and a half years (yes, I did actually calculate this). And so the mission for a summer job (my parents didn't want me to get a part time job because I "couldn't handle it". Excuse me?! But... I do thank them for that because in hindsight if I HAD gotten a part time my brain would've exploded of stress. So thank you Mommy and Daddy!! [Heart] ) began.

My heart goes out to all those trying to find a job. I truly, truly understand how hard it is. I applied to at least 12 different stores and organizations and I only got called for 2 interviews. The first one I actually, legitimately, bombed - I was so nervous. I didn't end up getting that one. But my second interview went extremely well and I had a summer job! After minutely calculating every single penny I earned, I finally paid off my trip and drained my bank account. But it was worth it!

Because I learned that money has value. And I grew up. I realized that as much as they love me, Mommy and Daddy aren't going to pay for everything in my life and that I'm going to have to (dare I say it?!) take responsibility for my own life. It definitely woke me up to reality - much like when Alistair realized that he had entered a different realm. He got to finally sit with the "older ones" and realized that life wasn't what he thought it was before.

In life, we all eventually grow up. It all happens to us in different ways whether through tragedies or minor obstacles. But one thing remains the same - we can all relate to this one, inevitable fact of life.

Wednesday, 10 April 2013

A Wong Review of the History of the English Language

So recently (well, yesterday), our class finished up our unit on the history of the English language. To be completely honest, I absolutely love history. Ancient Egypt, ancient Rome, the Tudors, the French Revolution - it's all so fascinating to see how the world developed over time. But.... the history of the English language? My first reaction is to sigh. What's so interesting about the development of a language? Nothing happens; a language is words and sentences. However I was (somewhat) pleasantly surprised! I'd like to recap what went through my mind about the English language for the past 1, 2...(has it been 3?) weeks.

 

Lesson 1 recapped in 3 sentences: Old English 450 - 1100

The Anglo-Saxon invasion of England brought about new vocabulary and a new language. They spelled words phonetically and had no standardization whatsoever. The most famous piece of literature that represents this period is "Beowulf" which creates the archetype of a hero that we still use today.

Words added to the language:
- house
- man, wife, child
- sheep, cow
- day, night
- universe

Thoughts on this lesson:
Well first of all, an invasion of anything or anywhere is pretty awesome by itself, can I just say. Secondly, not that I'm a nerd or anything, but I finally got to connect all my precious National Geographic articles about the Anglo-Saxons to something I could understand. It was pretty interesting to see that this invasion had such an impact on the very language I write in, I think in, that I speak in! And I finally got to see what the big deal about "Beowulf" was. To be completely honest, I thought "Seriously? That's what everyone makes such a big deal about? I can't even read it. What the heck is 'Ne sorga snotor guma!' supposed to mean?!" I was pretty convinced that it was not in fact English but a martian language. But after reviewing how much it impacted our modern day stories, I gained a little bit more respect for the anonymous author. Just a little.


Lesson 2 recapped in 3 sentences:  Middle English 1100 - 1500

After a couple hundred years, the Normans invaded England, bringing their French language to the higher classes while most of the native people still spoke English. One contribution of this period was comedy and satire, created by Chaucer. He wrote the very famous "Canterbury Tales", a collections of stories that featured no violence but simply comedy and word play.

Words added to the language:
- law, judge, parliament
- confectioner, pastry
- pork, mutton, beef, veal
- music, dance, literature, poetry

Thoughts:
Okay so I actually wasn't here during this lesson because I finally got called down to the office (YES! I swear I have psychic powers) so I might have missed this entirely... However, I did indeed do my homework and after reading the pages in the text book, my first thought was that Middle Age England has to learn how to defend itself! They seem to get invaded quite frequently. Don't think that's great for the national morale... My second thought was that I had no idea English had some sort of French origin. But it does explain why mansion is so similar to maison, why labour is the same in French as it is in English. IT ALL MAKES SENSE NOW. (Pause to admire this revelation) After I got over that, I thought it was pretty interesting that comedy had its roots in an English author because we see satire every day in our era today.


Lesson 3 recapped in 4 sentences: Early Modern English 1500 - 1800
This is the period of time when William Caxton introduced the printing press to England and helped disperse literature throughout the region. This is also the height of the English existence, with the English navy sailing the world, importing not only products but words as well. Samuel Johnson tried to create the dictionary but it was Noah Webster that finished it and published this piece of work we still use this day. This is also the era of sonnets, the most famous written by Anne Locke and Sir Philip Sidney.

Words added to the language:
- soprano, stanza, opera, violin, solo (from Italy)
- alligator, armada, cigar, cargo (from Spain)
- algebra, sugar, tapestry, zero, assassin (from Arabia)
- silk, tea, cash (from China)
- calico, thug, veranda, bungalow, polo (from India)
- toboggan, moose, moccasin, skunk, tobacco (from North America)

Thoughts:
First of all, my Lutheran roots were very proud about the fact that the German Gutenberg created the printing press and dispersed Martin Luther's 95 These across Europe. (For those of you not so familiar with Christianity, Lutheranism is a branch of Christianity, much like being Protestant or Baptist). So when I heard that all of a sudden this Caxton guy exists and apparently invents the printing press I thought "Whoa whoa whoa. Back up. It was Gutenberg first." (sometimes I get a bit defensive about certain things...). But learning that Caxton introduced the printing press to England, it was totally cool. I was just about to start an international debate... I have to say, I liked this era of the history of the English language the best. I thought what Noah Webster did was very ambitious and I commend his dedication. Without this standardizing of the language, we would never be able to communicate with other people who speak English as well but are from different regions of the world. Bravo Noah Webster! I will definitely pick up a copy of the Merriam-Webster dictionary now. (Or just google definitions...) My favourite part of this entire unit was the Sonnets. Man, if only I had a boyfriend who would write me sonnets. (Correction. If only I had a boyfriend. Period.) He'd be a keeper for sure. And the fact that Anne Locke was the first female to write a sonnet? GIRL POWER. You show those obsessive male poets what women can do Anne/Ann/An Locke/Lock/Loch!


Lesson 4 recapped in 0 sentences: Present Day English 1800 - today

Words added to language:
- computer
- e-mail
- subway

Thoughts:
Oh wait. I don't believe we had a lesson on this time period. But apparently, because of advancements in technology, transportation, communication devices, the English language has obtained many more additions to its vocabulary.

All in all, I didn't think I would take a lot from this unit. But looking at this blog, I realized I really did! Although sometimes dry, learning the origins of your own language can explain many things. I will never again take the dictionary for granted.

Saturday, 23 March 2013

A Letter to My Friend




Dearest Essay,

    Well, what can I say. We all knew you were coming. Yet we still dread it every year. I'm sorry you have to be the victim of such violent discrimination. I know it probably hurts a lot when some of us tear up papers and talk about you badly. I can only imagine the emotional toll of high school students all sighing in sync when the topic of you comes up. I want you to know it's not you, it's... just the fact that you're a little... high maintenance.

   I mean, take it from our point of view: we have to actually think when we write you. Like think about it: a hook, a theses, three arguments, introductory sentences, concluding sentences, a profound ending... It's just a lot to deal with buddy. Some of us just don't want to spend that much time with you. We'd rather go on the internet to search up funny videos of cats. Again I'm sorry.

    But it's not that we don't appreciate you! You are quite useful - we'll all probably end up having to write an essay later on in life (for university, for scholarship applications) and so our relationship is quite precious. It's nice that you're so structured and organized. If I were to write everything that passed through my mind in the order it came to me, the world would be confused. I'll be the first to admit that my brain is very hard to follow. My mind: a very scary, scary place. It's nice that you balance me out, you know?

    It's just the topics that kill me. Write about injustices in our world? About the environment? About children who are dying in Africa of starvation because people in this world are incredibly selfish..........*continues to rant*..........? (15 minutes later) That'd be great. I'd have a lot (a lot) to say. But write about the English language? About verses from Shakespeare? About video game technology? (No offence to all the gamers out there.) Please save me. There's just no depth. I can't go into much detail about those topics. It's just not my passion, I can't try to convince someone to love or hate something I feel nothing for. I'd rather run a 5 kilometre marathon. And that says a lot. Trust me when I say that when I choose physical exertion over a written assignment, I'm desperate. All those gym classes are behind me. I never again want to publicly humiliate myself by tripping up the stairs, by scoring on my own net or by running in the opposite direction during a mass marathon (not that it actually happened before...)

    All in all, I really do love you. All those haters out there, they just haven't realized your potential yet. Just be a little easier on them okay? And don't take it too personally. You'll always have me.

I'm sure we'll be in contact for the following couple of years (yay for post-secondary education). I'll always be your loyal friend.

Love,
Rebecca



Friday, 8 March 2013

Themes of Othello

1. Prejudice



A) "... an old black ram
Is tupping your white ewe."
- Act 1, scene 1, lines 89 - 90

    Here Roderigo and Iago demonstrate an act of prejudice based on race. They say very crude and racist things about Othello simply because he is black. They say that Brabantio’s daughter Desdemona is intimately related to an old, disgusting animal.

    Racism still exists today (hate groups, Anti-Semetic movements, genocides) however I like to think violence based on racial issues has subsided a lot today compared to a few decades before us. Black History Month has become more and more popular, raising awareness about racism and its horrible consequences in the past. While there will always be extremist groups who choose to hate certain races, I hope that it will decrease with the years. 



C) "I therefore apprehend and do attach thee

For an abuser of the world, a practiser
Of arts inhibited and out of warrant."
- Act 1, scene 2, lines 77 - 79

 


D) "Whoe'er he be that in this foul proceeding
Hath thus beguil'd your daughter of herself,
And you of her, the bloody book of law
You shall yourself read in the bitter letter
After your own sense, yea, though our proper son
Stood in your action."
- Act 1, scene 3, lines 65 – 70

     Here Brabantio and the Duke are assuming the worst of Othello before hearing the whole story. They assume that he put a spell on Desdemona, that he abused her and that he deserves to be punished. However, they don’t know that Desdemona legitimately fell in love with Othello and judge him before taking the time to look at all sides.

    This prejudice exists still today. Teenagers will at times believe gossip rumours about another teenager without getting to know the truth of what actually happened. Others accuse people of acts they didn’t commit because they assume the worst of that person. Everywhere you go, people tend to judge you based on your appearance or your first encounter without taking the time to know you; especially in high schools. The recent "crackdown" on bullying in elementary schools has helped a bit however I think as long as humans exist, prejudice will always exist. It is human nature to evaluate people based on what we observe when we first meet someone.

2. Identity





"Reputation, reputation, reputation! O, I have lost my reputation! I have lost the immortal part of myself, and what remains is bestial. My reputation, Iago, my reputation!"
- Act 2, scene 3. lines 245 - 248


    Identity is a big theme all throughout Othello. Shakespeare highlights how much reputation and social status influenced character's identities. For example, Iago uses reputation to destroy Cassio's identity. He ruins him and all he is by showing Montano that Cassio is always drunk and that he is completely irresponsible. Cassio exclaims that his reputation is completely destroyed and that without it, he is nothing.  This goes to show how important your reputation was in the Elizabethan era and how they felt what others thought of you was crucial to your own personal identity. Another factor of one's identity is your race and social status. As we see in Othello and Desdemona's marriage, the unity of two different social classes and even worse, races, was not easily accepted. In the 1600's you couldn't marry or have any relationships with other classes without being looked down upon.

    Nowadays, our identity is not so much distinguished by our race or social status anymore, but moreso how we feel about issues, our values and beliefs. People have become much more united by common ideas and philosophies rather than physical aspects of life. However identity will always be an issue in the development of humans. Everyone goes through questions of what they really want, and who they really are. It's a stage that every single human being has to pass through to feel that they have a fulfilling life.

    Manipulation (of identity)


"Thus do I ever make my fool my purse,
For I mine own gain'd knowledge should I profane
If I would time expend with such a snipe
But for my sport and profit."
- Act 1, scene 3, lines 374 - 377



    In this passage, Iago is clearly taking advantage Roderigo, one who is not as cunning or smart as himself. He manipulates Roderigo to take the risk to talk to Brabantio in the beginning of the Act but also to sell all of his land so that Iago can use this money to advance his scheme. Later on in the play, Iago also manipulates Cassio and Othello.

    Iago ruin's Cassio's reputation and makes him vulnerable, then manipulates him to talk to Desdemona which sets him up for ambush. Iago then "pours pestilence" into Othello's ear to cloud his judgement , make him vulnerable as a warrior who is supposed to be in charge of everything and then sweeps him into his web to destroy Othello's life. All this manipulation of their identities is what really seals their fate.

    There are many people today who take advantage of those of less abled in today’s society. 
Those with power and authority tend to abuse it (corrupt police officers, Catholic priests convicted of sexual abuse) and there are some who simply try to make themselves feel better by stringing along weaker individuals (bulllies in schools, those who abuse mentally disabled men and women). Much like deceit, if people see a possible personal gain, they will do anything to get it. Manipulation is a form of taking advantage of people in order to get something out of them for their personal profit. To this day, when someone demoralizes another or dehumanizes them, manipulation is only amplified. In any era when you belittle someone and take their identity, something irreplaceable, the damage is all the more worse.

3. Perception vs. Reality




"For when my outward action doth demonstrate
The native act and figure of my heart
In complement extern, 'tis not long after
But I will wear my heart upon my sleeve
For daws to peck at. I am not what I am."
- Act 1, scene 1, lines 62 – 66


False Perceptions:

- Iago is "honest"
- Desdemona is a "whore"
- Cassio is a "drunk"
- Roderigo has a chance with Desdemona
- Othello is in control of his life

    Throughout all of Othello, there is always the notion of perception vs. reality. What characters are perceived as to other characters are almost always false and the direct opposite of what they really are. The biggest example: Iago is "honest" and "good" but really, he is the most flawed and evil character there is. Desdemona, perceived as a whore and cheater to Othello, is the most innocent of all. Cassio is actually a really good guy, very responsible but is falsely perceived as a drunk. Roderigo believes until the very end that he actually has a chance with Desdemona and Othello really isn't in control of his life; he becomes miserable and torn apart by his wife's alleged affair.

    You see this deceit in other literary works (Valère in Molière’s L’Avare pretends to be Harpagon’s best servant for his own personal gain) and definitely in real life. Teenagers also backstab each other in vengeance. Unfortunately many people still live according to the “Keep your friends close and your enemies closer” rule. Ultimately if possible gain comes into play and greed takes over, people will do anything to become richerm, including deceiving innocent people (internet scams, lying to the public in order to get a higher position for a job).

Weirdos vs. Eccentrics

Weirdos vs. Eccentrics


"Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." the great Dr. Seuss once said. However, according to author Pico Iyer, that could get you into some hot water.

In a society riddled with many mental health issues and self esteem troubles, we are taught to be proud of our "uniqueness" and to not be ashamed of our own personalities. Adults like to tell us that being normal is being different. After all, "normal" is a subjective term. It's because of this philosophy that I can't fully accept what Pico Iyer is arguing in his essay "Of Weirdos and Eccentrics".

In a way, I can understand how a "weirdo" is different from an "eccentric". An eccentric is apparently someone who has different interests and/or hobbies than the rest of society and who is comfortable being called strange. A weirdo on the other hand is someone who tries to be normal even though naturally, they have very different personalities compared to the mass population. It is highly possible that they will commit very dangerous acts in this mission to join society. However, what exactly is "weird", "eccentric" and "normal"?

Pico Iyer seems to think that those who have disturbed or troubled minds (those who commit violent murders, shootings, who convince others to commit mass suicides) should be defined as "weirdos". Those who have strange and different hobbies, who have personalities which are more "quirky" should be defined as "eccentric". Weirdos are a menace to society, as the Old English word apparently holds the idea of dark and other-worldly forces and eccentric is "anything that departs from the center".

But can't a weirdo just be a troubled eccentric? Can't an eccentric turn into a weirdo? Are these terms not interchangeable? Iyer says that the main difference between a weirdo and an eccentric is that the weirdo cares very much about what society thinks of him or her and the eccentric simply doesn't care. I think this categorizing of people is unfair and prejudiced. If I see someone collecting strange objects and think he's a weirdo, does that mean that I should avoid him at all costs since he could be dangerous to me?

All in all, I feel that this essay is discussing a subject that has no solid footing at all. Human beings cannot be categorized, especially not according to the ambiguous term "normal". What is normal to one person could be different from another, thus "normal" can't be used as a universal term for anything. Pico Iyer seems to think any criminal is a weirdo and not an ordinary human being who, under horrible emotional and personal circumstances, committed unthinkable acts. He seems to detach weirdos and eccentrics from all other human beings. In reality, we are all the same. People are people, emotions are emotions. Whatever the distinction we try to create between each other is futile.